AMD claims their new Radeon RX 6800 XT graphics card competes with the Nvidia RTX 3080 for less money. I’m going to put this claim to the examination by comparing both in 14 games at 4K, 1440p, and 1080p resolutions and also content designer workloads to see what the distinctions are. Let’s start with the spec differences, I think the important point to note is that the 6800 XT has 16gb of memory, greater than the 10 in the 3080, though the 3080’s memory is faster. The 6800 XT expenses $50 much less than the 3080 though, however it will also interest see if they will certainly have issues keeping it in stock like Nvidia has actually had. This is the system that I’m utilizing to evaluate out both graphics cards, it’s obtained an overclocked i9-10900K at 5.
2GHz with 32gb of DDR4-3200 CL14 memory in twin network. This need to maintain points reasonable for every GPU, however Radeon 6000 series GPUs can get an increase with an AMD cpu, yet that’s a topic for afterward. I have actually got a checklist of all elements and also upgraded prices linked in the summary. We’ll first explore the pc gaming results, then have a look at price per framework, power draw, and content creator workloads later on. Microsoft Flight Simulator was examined in the Sydney landing challenge, and there’s a trend right here
that showed up throughout a lot of the video games evaluated, where the 6800 XT was ahead at 1080p, but after that the 3080 started drawing ahead as we go up to greater resolutions, regardless of the 6800 XT having a higher memory capability. Red Dead Redemption 2 was checked utilizing the video games benchmark tool. This time the 3080 was simply directly in advance no matter resolution, though not by large margins. The 6800 XT was 5% slower at 1080p, however then 12% slower at 4K, so again the 3080 is doing better at higher resolutions. Battlefield 5 was evaluated in campaign setting by running through the exact same objective on both graphics cards. Both were striking the 200 FPS cap at 1080p to ensure that’s not as well beneficial.
At 1440p the 6800 XT was reaching 14% higher typical FPS when compared to the 3080, then at 4K both are doing primarily the very same, with a little bit more of an edge in 1% lows to the 6800 XT. Shadow of the Burial place Raider was examined with the games integrated in standard. This was one more of the video games where the 6800 XT was in advance at lower resolutions, yet then at 4K the 3080 was 4% ahead, which in this instance was simply 3 FPS, so only little distinctions in either case. Enjoy Pets Myriad was additionally tested with the games benchmark device. The 6800 XT was 8% faster than the 3080 at 1080p, at 1440p they have to do with the exact same, however then at 4K the 3080 was virtually 10% quicker in typical FPS with a 7% higher 1% reduced. For Control I’ll start with ray mapping off results. The RTX 3080 was ahead at all resolutions in this one, and also at 4K and also 1440p resolutions the performance difference was the biggest out of all titles that I’ve checked, yet nevertheless I still found 4K on the 6800 XT fairly playable, as well as 100 FPS at 1440p is still a decent outcome. I have actually evaluated ray mapping with the high profile made it possible for. No DLSS was used right here, as that’s an Nvidia only function, nevertheless that would certainly additionally be an advantage to the Nvidia system in the video games that sustain it. Anyhow the 3080 was much even more ahead contrasted to a lot of the various other games examined when looking at ray mapping, not as well unexpected I presume given it’s been made
with the Nvidia implementation in mind as that’s what’s been available for 2 years now. Dust 5 on the various other hand was a massive win for the 6800 XT. Complete disclosure, AMD provided a trick for this game as well as I wasn’t sure if I would certainly add it in as I recognized it was plainly mosting likely to favour them, however hey it is a brand-new game people will play, and the ray tracing results remain in contrast to what we simply saw prior to in Control which I thought was worth going over. As this title was developed for ray mapping on RDNA 2, we’re seeing practically the opposite of control with ray tracing allowed where Nvidia had an above ordinary lead there, so generally it appears to depend on the certain video game and also how it’s enhanced rather than simply a covering declaration that one’s much better than the other in ray mapping. I have actually checked Metro Exodus with the video game’s benchmark tool. This was another win for the 6800 XT at all resolutions, though the distinctions are much smaller sized this time, only one to 2 frames different in the averages so type of margin of error stuff, though there was a bit even more of a difference kept in mind in 1% lows. The Witcher 3 had one of the smallest distinctions out of the video games checked in typical FPS, as you can see it’s quite close at 1080p as well as 1440p, though the difference at 4K was a little larger, it’s less than 4 FPS. The 6800 XT was nonetheless especially much better in 1% lows across all 3 resolutions. Talking of little distinctions, fatality stranding remained in a similar watercraft, at least in regards to ordinary FPS. The 6800 XT was slightly ahead in the averages, however this time around the 3080 had the advantage in 1% lows at 1440p and also 1080p. Assassin’s Creed Valhalla was tested with the video games benchmark device. The 6800 XT had a far more noticeable lead in this one, no matter the
resolution in use. It was 8% faster than the 3080 at 4K, but then at 1440p it’s now 21% faster, and after that 29% faster at 1080p, the 2nd biggest difference out of the 14 games evaluated. Assassin’s Creed Odyssey was also checked with the built in standard, I checked this before Valhalla appeared so figured I ‘d include it as I’ve got the information. The results below are apparently the reverse of several various other games I have actually evaluated, where the 3080 was doing better at 1080p, but after that at greater resolutions the 6800 XT was in front, with a 12% lead at 1440p and 7% at 4K. Telephone Call of Obligation Modern Warfare was checked in campaign setting. Like a lot of other games, just minor differences right here. Primarily the exact same ordinary FPS at 4K and also 1440p, while the 6800 XT was practically 5% much better at 1080p. Rainbow Six Siege was checked using the video games benchmark tool with Vulkan. I seem like I’ve said this sufficient times currently, however when even more the 6800 XT was doing much better in average structure price at 1080p, but then the 3080 takes the lead at 1440p and also 4K. The 3080 was just 2% faster at 1440p as well as 6.5% faster at 4K. At 1080p generally over all 14 games examined the 6800 XT was 5% faster than the RTX 3080 in average FPS. Dirt 5 and Assassin’s Creed Valhalla are definitely boosting the total standard, yet also if we remove these as outliers the 6800 XT was still somewhat ahead on average. Tipping up to 1440p and also although the distinction in Dust 5 is still the greatest out of the video games covered, the void isn’t as big now when contrasted to some of the other titles. The 6800 XT is around
4.6% faster than the 3080 generally below. At 4K the 6800 XT was 1.4% slower on typical than the 3080, and once more without dust 5 it was closer to being 3.4% slower, so a little bit of a distinction that a person video game can make, however at the end of the day there’s still not a massive difference in between these graphics cards usually. On ordinary though I do not assume the efficiency differences are enough to make a recognizable difference in any case, as a number of the games are carrying out rather very closely with each other, though there are of course outliers. If you generally play titles that do one method or the various other, after that it could make feeling to choose one for claim Dirt 5 or an additional for Control, however for one of the most component in the choice of games I’ve evaluated, it’s really difficult to go too incorrect with either, as both offer piece de resistance. With performance being rather close together on average, the 6800 XT finishes up supplying better worth as it’s $50 less expensive than the 3080, and also this was the instance at all three resolutions examined. It will interest see if Nvidia does anything to counter this. The power draw results were interesting. The system with the 3080 set up was just drawing a little bit more power in this test, 4% higher wattage in Control at 4K with RTX off, but if you recall the 3080 was likewise performing a fair little bit much better right here with a 17% greater ordinary framework rate in the very same examination, granted this game did see the very best outcome on the 3080 out of the titles tested at 4K, it simply occurs to be the game I’ve been making use of to compare power draw with recently. In terms of efficiency per watt, when taking a look at the arise from all 14 video games, the 6800 XT has the ability to obtain more made with the same quantity of power, as once more typically the framework prices aren’t as well various. This could sound crazy, yet there’s even more than simply video gaming out there. I’ve also contrasted both in material designer
work. I have actually examined DaVinci Settle with the Puget Solutions benchmark, as well as the 3080 was racking up around 27% greater than the 6800 XT, so a much bigger difference when compared to the majority of the games covered formerly. I must keep in mind that the results on the 3080 were far more consistent, whereas I needed to run the test 7 times on the 6800 XT to come to this average, as I was obtaining scores in between 813 as well as 979. I’ve made use of Adobe Premiere to export one of my testimonial videos at 4K, as well as the 3080 was much faster in this one as well, once more the difference was more so when contrasted to the majority of the games. I’m not certain if both of these software collections need to be updated for the RX 6000 series though. Mixer was checked with the Open Data benchmark. Surprisingly the 3080 was only finishing the classroom examination a 2nd faster than the 6800 XT, yet in the much shorter BMW examination the 3080 was 46% faster, so rather a distinction. Generally it would appear that the 3080 has the edge beyond pc gaming. So all points thought about, the Radeon RX 6800 XT is resembling an engaging option. It’s being available in less costly than the Nvidia RTX 3080, as well as in a lot of the video games checked the performance distinctions just aren’t that large, though this does obviously vary by game. Integrated with the fact that the 6800 XT has more VRAM, I’m expecting it to last longer and so much better at greater resolutions years from now, that will most definitely be worth
taking another look at in future. The fact that AMD is also competing at RTX 3080 level currently is rather remarkable, but it will interest see exactly how things like motorist stability look at time, as that was a pretty big problem with Radeon graphics cards last generation. I did in fact have some video game collisions on the 6800 XT, both in red dead redemption 2 and also city exodus, but to be fair I had both of those same games crash on a current Nvidia based laptop computer simply last week. I’m just a small sample size of one, we really need to wait and also see what happens once people start getting these products right into their hands as well as get them running in even more as well as various hardware setups. Likewise it’s additionally mosting likely to be fascinating to see just how much supply is available, if it’s tough to buy on launch for months like the RTX 3080 then that’s not going to be a fantastic experience for customers. Along with the XT version, I’ll additionally be contrasting the non XT version against various other graphics cards, so ensure you’re subscribed for those future video clips, but for currently, what not have a look at just how the RTX 3080 compare to a few other graphics cards, I’ll see you over in among those video clips.